The arbitrator should express his opinion with integrity and without any prejudice to any of the parties.

Scientific research shall be judged with absolute secrecy in order to prevent manipulation and theft of scientific research.

The arbitrator must provide his notes, opinions, criticisms, and directions.

The arbitrator must refer to the paragraphs that he has impersonated, and he must attach the original reference with them.

The arbitrator must be able to distinguish between scientific plagiarism and the error that occurs as a result of a researcher's inexperience or inadvertently.

The arbitrator must have sincerity, honesty, and integrity in work. He must also be objective and put personal relationships on one side, and not let them affect him.

The arbitrator should also be patient, and not be in a hurry while judging the researches.

The arbitrator must also be able to keep the arbitration secret.

The arbitrator must also be familiar with all standards and controls of scientific arbitration.

The arbitrator must also have sufficient information about the subject of the scientific research he is judging.

The arbitrator must also make the arbitration at a time when he finds complete comfort.

The arbitrator must also respect the effort made by the researcher in scientific research.

The arbitrator must use gentle words that do not offend the researcher while the arbitrator directs the notes for scientific research.

The arbitrator must verify the quality of the research before issuing his decision to dismiss it or not.